The Lord Will

Faith & Emotional Health

The Heart of Stone and Emotional Suffering: What Ezekiel 36 Can and Cannot Say About Mental Health

General psychoeducation and pastoral application of Ezekiel 36. Why a biblical metaphor is not a diagnosis, and how to distinguish regulation, containment, avoidance, and dissociation.

By Ugo Candido8 min read

Caution. This guide offers general psychoeducation and a pastoral application of the biblical text. It does not make diagnoses and does not replace a professional assessment. A biblical metaphor is not a diagnosis. Intense, persistent, or disabling symptoms require a health consultation. Do not discontinue any treatment on your own. In case of immediate risk to you or others, seek help right away: call your local emergency number, go to the nearest emergency department, or contact an official crisis service in your country.

This is the third guide in the series on Ezekiel 36. After reading the text in its context (guide 1) and the relationship between grace and responsibility (guide 2), we turn to the most delicate point: the boundary between spiritual application and mental health.

In brief

Mental health does not consist in not feeling negative emotions. A healthy response allows a person to recognize what they feel, keep contact with reality, and choose a course of conduct. The heart of flesh can be used pastorally as an image of receptivity and living response, but it is not a clinical concept. Mental disorders, trauma, and dissociation must not be reinterpreted as simple spiritual hardness.

Emotional distress and mental disorder are not synonyms

Every human being experiences sadness, fear, anger, shame, loneliness, jealousy, and grief. These experiences can be painful without automatically constituting a mental disorder.

According to the World Health Organization, a mental disorder is characterized by a clinically significant disturbance in cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior, usually associated with distress or impairment in important areas of functioning.

The distinction does not depend on a single emotion, but on factors such as:

  • intensity;
  • duration;
  • frequency;
  • loss of control;
  • impairment of sleep, work, study, or relationships;
  • the presence of cognitive, perceptual, or behavioral symptoms;
  • risk to safety.

A breakup can produce weeks of pain without indicating an illness. If, however, the person barely sleeps anymore, cannot work, loses weight, uses substances, develops suicidal thoughts or severe agitation, the situation requires a different assessment.

Why one should not diagnose with a biblical metaphor

Telling a depressed person that they have a "heart of stone" can be theologically imprecise and clinically harmful.

Depression can include anhedonia, reduced energy, cognitive difficulties, guilt, and disturbances of sleep and appetite. Post-traumatic stress disorder can include avoidance, hypervigilance, intrusions, and detachment. Dissociation can produce sensations of unreality or separation from oneself. Psychosis can significantly alter the perception of reality.

None of these conditions can be diagnosed or explained simply as unavailability to God.

The metaphor of the heart of stone concerns, in the text, Israel's moral and spiritual inability to live faithfully in the covenant. It can help us reflect on defenses and on insensitivity, but it does not replace clinical categories.

Mental health does not mean continuous happiness

The WHO defines mental health as a state of well-being that enables a person to cope with the stresses of life, use their abilities, learn, work, and contribute to their community.

This definition does not require the absence of pain. A mentally healthy person can be grieving, frightened, or angry. The question is whether they can, with time and the necessary support, remain in relationship with reality and function.

The heart of flesh is therefore not a heart that is continuously serene. It is, on the pastoral level, a heart able to be touched without losing every possibility of response.

Four processes that must not be confused

Emotional regulation

The person recognizes an emotion, understands at least in part its meaning, and chooses how to behave. Fear can signal a risk; anger an injustice; sadness a loss. The emotion is heard, but not treated as an infallible order.

Temporary containment

When intensity is excessive, it may be necessary to reduce it in order to regain safety and functioning. Slow breathing, grounding, moving away from a stimulus, the support of another person, rest, or a prescribed treatment can create space to think.

To contain is not to deny. It is useful when it later allows a person to return to the experience with greater capacity.

Avoidance

The person organizes their life so as not to encounter thoughts, memories, places, or sensations that generate suffering. In the short term, avoidance can reduce anxiety. In post-traumatic stress disorder, however, the WHO notes that avoidance strategies can contribute to maintaining and intensifying the re-experiencing of symptoms over time.

Not all avoidance is pathological. Moving away from an aggressor or not exposing oneself to a real danger is protection. It becomes problematic when it generalizes and progressively narrows life.

Dissociation

Dissociation can include detachment from emotions, body, identity, or environment. It is not simply the decision to "not think about it." It can occur in relation to trauma or other conditions and requires a competent assessment when it is intense or recurrent.

It is not correct to treat it as a defect of faith or to ask the person to overcome it by willpower alone.

An emotion is real, but it is not always a verdict

To say that an emotion is real means to recognize that the person is genuinely experiencing it. It does not mean that the interpretation associated with it is necessarily correct.

Example:

  • fact: "They haven't answered the message for two days";
  • emotion: fear and sadness;
  • interpretation: "No one will ever love me";
  • impulse: send ten messages or disappear from all relationships.

The emotion deserves attention. The interpretation requires verification. The impulse requires discernment.

This distinction is compatible with faith: the believer can bring to God what they feel without automatically attributing divine authority to every thought generated by the emotion.

The problem of emotional anesthesia

A person in suffering may wish to feel nothing at all. The desire is understandable: if the emotion seems unbearable, numbness appears as salvation.

However, a generalized anesthesia can reduce not only fear and pain, but also joy, affection, empathy, motivation, and the ability to recognize one's own needs.

For this reason the goal of care is not generically to "feel more" or "feel less." It is to increase the capacity to:

  • tolerate the experience;
  • understand it;
  • remain oriented in reality;
  • choose;
  • function;
  • maintain relationships and boundaries.

A reduction of intensity can be therapeutic if it restores freedom. It can be problematic if it produces further disconnection and impairment. This theme is explored in depth in guide 4.

Trauma: protection and cost

After traumatic experiences, some responses of shutting down, hypervigilance, or detachment can be attempts of the human system to protect itself. They must not be moralized.

This does not mean they must remain unchanged. A strategy that helped a person survive can, over time, prevent relationships, sleep, work, and a sense of safety.

Trauma-informed care does not ask: "Why don't you stop?" It asks: "What happened, what function does this response serve, and how can a safer alternative be built?"

Pastoral application can add: God does not despise the person for the defenses they have built, but does not necessarily leave them a prisoner of those defenses.

Marta: normal pain or a clinical situation?

In the first days after the breakup, Marta cried, slept poorly, and struggled to concentrate. These reactions, considered on their own, could belong to a foreseeable human grief.

After two months, however, she could barely work anymore, had lost interest in every activity, slept only a few hours, drank in order to fall asleep, and thought that life no longer had any meaning.

At that point the question was no longer only: "How does she apply Ezekiel 36?" A clinical assessment and an immediate check of safety were needed.

Faith remained important, but its first concrete act became asking for help and describing the symptoms precisely.

Signs that call for a consultation

It is advisable to turn to a professional when the following appear or persist:

  • strong impairment of daily activities;
  • marked insomnia or hypersomnia;
  • recurrent panic attacks;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs to manage emotions;
  • recurrent detachment, amnesias, or sensations of unreality;
  • hallucinations, delusions, or severe disorganization;
  • dangerous impulsivity;
  • self-harm;
  • suicidal thoughts;
  • inability to care for essential needs.

There is no need to wait until the situation becomes extreme. A general practitioner can be a first point of access; depending on the case, a psychologist, psychotherapist, psychiatrist, or local services may be indicated.

A rigorous application of the heart of flesh

On the pastoral level, a heart of flesh can be described as a heart that:

  • does not deny what it feels;
  • does not identify every emotion with the truth;
  • does not use pain to violate another's freedom;
  • accepts help;
  • can set limits;
  • distinguishes protection from isolation;
  • maintains responsibility even in frailty.

This application is not a diagnostic criterion. It is a spiritual orientation compatible with care.

For practice

When an emotion becomes intense, write four lines:

  1. Observable fact: what actually happened?
  2. Emotion: what do I feel in body and mind?
  3. Interpretation: what conclusion am I forming?
  4. Safe action: what behavior protects reality, dignity, and responsibility?

Continue the series

Sources & References

Author:
Ugo Candido
Reviewed by:
The Lord Will Editorial Team, Editorial Review
Last updated:
Category:
Faith & Emotional Health
Reviewed on: