Answer a fool — or don't?
Rhetorical contrastDisputed interpretationModerateDo not answer a fool according to his folly (26:4)
- 26:4
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Answer a fool according to his folly (26:5)
- 26:5
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
- The apparent conflict
- Two consecutive verses give opposite instructions using almost identical wording. Read as rules, they cannot both be followed.
- The distinction
- Each line states the risk of the opposite course. Answering on the fool's terms means adopting his frame; refusing to answer at all leaves him confirmed in his own estimate. The pair is placed deliberately side by side.
- How they hold together
- The most common reading is that the juxtaposition is the teaching: it shows that these sayings are situational judgements rather than rules, and that discerning which risk is live is the reader's work.
What stays unresolved
The text supplies no criterion for deciding which verse applies to a given situation, and readings that assign each verse to a different kind of fool are inferences rather than statements of the text.
▸Evidence(2)
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Sources: Proverbs (Anchor Yale Bible commentary series) (Yale University Press) · The Book of Proverbs (New International Commentary on the Old Testament) (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.)
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
Sources: Proverbs (Anchor Yale Bible commentary series) (Yale University Press) · The Book of Proverbs (New International Commentary on the Old Testament) (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.)
Quoted from the public-domain translation committed for this locale.